Skip to main content

Author: Phạm Huyền

Mediation at court – an effective and potential dispute resolution method

When mentioning dispute resolution options between enterprises, we often think of suing at a Court or Suing at a Commercial Arbitration Center. However, in addition to the above two options, enterprises can choose another option, which is mediation in court. In this article, TNTP will introduce to enterprises an effective dispute resolution method, which is pre-procedural mediation.

1. What is pre-procedural mediation?

Pre-procedure mediation under the Law on Mediation or Dialogue at Court 2020 is an activity held at the Court before the Court accepts civil cases to assist the parties involved in the mediation of civil cases. Mediation will be conducted by Mediators who are qualified to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the Provincial People’s Court to conduct mediation. Pre-procedure mediation is not a procedure that must be carried out before the Court proceeds to accept the civil case; however, the Court will notify and request the plaintiff to accept the pre-procedural mediation or not.

2. Pre-litigation mediation stages

– If the plaintiff does not agree to pre-procedure mediation, the court will take note of the opinion and not conduct the mediation to carry out further proceedings.

– If the plaintiff agrees to mediation, the next stages are as follows:

Stage 1: Plaintiff writes information in the Statement of Opinion of the Plaintiff/Requester on the selection of mediation and mediator. The court will advise the plaintiff to choose the right mediator for the case.

Stage 2: After filling in all information in the Statement of Opinions, Plaintiff returns to the Court the Minutes of Opinion.

Stage 3: The court will assign the case to the selected mediator and arrange the mediation schedule, the information about the mediation schedule will be arranged by the mediator and notified to the plaintiff and the respondent.

Stage 4: After arranging the mediation schedule, the Mediator will conduct the Mediation session at the Court.

Stage 5: If the parties agree on a mediation plan, the mediator will set a time to open a meeting to record the results of the mediation. At the end of the Session, the Court Judge will sign and confirm the Minutes of mediation results.

Stage 6: Within 15 days from the date on which the Minutes of recording the results of mediation are issued, if the parties have no opinion on changes, additions, or objections to this Minutes, the court will issue the Decision on recognition of successful mediation. This Decision will take legal effect from the date of issuance and will not be appealed or protested according to appellate procedures and shall be subject to judgment enforcement.

Note: The cost of mediation at the Court is covered by the state budget. The parties will have to bear the mediation fee if the case falls into one of the following cases: (i) Disputes on business and trade related to the monetary claim; (ii) When the parties agree to select a place for mediation or dialogue outside the court’s headquarters; when the mediator examines the current state of assets related to the civil case or administrative lawsuit which are outside the administrative boundaries of the province where the competent court is located; (iii) Foreign language interpretation costs.

3. Pros and cons of Pre-procedure mediation

a) Pros

– Can save a lot of time compared to the adjudication procedure because the process from the beginning of the medication to the Decision to recognize the successful mediation results.

– Cost savings because the mediation in court is guaranteed by the state budget, so if it is not in the cases where the costs are incurred, the parties may not have to bear any costs at all.

b) Cons

– The mediation can only be made if both parties agree to come up with a mediation plan and have good faith in mediation.

– Due to the need to agree to come up with a mediation plan, the plaintiff may have to share a part of the benefits with the defendant.

– If the mediation has been agreed upon and the Court has issued the Decision to recognize the successful mediation results, the party will not be able to initiate a lawsuit against the claims already resolved by the court.

Above is the legal opinion of TNTP on the method of dispute resolution Pre-procedure Mediation at Court. TNTP hopes this article will be valuable and useful for enterprises

Best regards,

  1. For additional information and the newest articles from TNTP and Associates International Law Firm, please join our Facebook Fanpages at:
  1. Please click on the following link to learn more about legal knowledge:

https://dsdc.com.vn/en/category/legal-newsletter/

  1. Please click on the following links to learn more about the legal services of TNTP and Associates International Law Firm:
  1. For additional information, please contact us at:

TNTP and Associates International Law Firm

Lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha

Phone: 0931 798 818

Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com

Disciplinary dismissal of employees who repeats a violation which was disciplined by deferment of pay rise or demotion and has not been absolved or fails to go to work without a plausible reason

Dismissal is the heaviest form of labor discipline, which not only directly affects the  current source of  income  but can also seriously affect the career of employees. Therefore, in the spirit of protecting employees, Vietnam’s labor law strictly regulates the cases in which employers are allowed  to apply the  form of dismissal.

In the last article of the topic “In some circumstances when employers can dismiss an employee for disciplinary reasons”, TNTP analyzes the last two circumstances in which employers can apply the form of disciplinary dismissal to employees, specifically: (i) The employees repeat a violation during the period when they have not cleared the employee’s discipline; (ii) The employee fails to go to work without a plausible reason.

2. An employer may dismiss an employee for disciplinary reasons in the following circumstances:

2.5 The employees repeat a violation during the period when they have not cleared the employee’s discipline and fails to go to work without a plausible reason

a. The employees repeat a violation during the period when they have not cleared the employee’s discipline

Pursuant to Clause 3, Article 125 of the 2019 Labor Code, employers may handle employees in the form of dismissal if the employee repeats a violation which was disciplined by deferment of pay rise or demotion and has not been absolved.

Recidivism is a case in which an employee repeats an offense that has been disciplined without being cleared of discipline, which is specified in Article 126 of the Labor Code as follows:

–  An employee who commits a violation that is disciplined by reprimand, deferment of pay rise or demotion will have the previous violation absolved after 03 months, 06 months or 03 years respectively from the day on which the disciplinary measure is imposed if he/she does not commit any violation against internal labor regulations.

– Where an employee who is disciplined by deferment of wage increase has completed half of the duration of the disciplinary measure and has demonstrated improvement, the employer may consider a remission.

Similar to Clause 2, Article 125 of the 2019 Labor Code on employees committing acts that cause serious damage or threaten to cause particularly serious damage to the property and interests of the employer, Clause 3, Article 125 of the 2019 Labor Code also creates a certain openness for employers to handle employees by dismissal. Accordingly, laws and guidance documents that   do not clearly provide for  violations, the extent and nature of the acts are disciplined in the form of dismissal or extension of the salary increase period.

This also shows that Vietnam’s labor law always emphasizes voluntary agreements between employees and employers, employers are actively  specified in the Labor Regulations or agreements in the Labor Contract with Employees to serve as a basis for handling labor unions.  establish and strengthen labor force, increase the operational efficiency of the enterprise.

b. Employees fail to go to work without a plausible reason

According to Point e, Clause 1, Article 36 of the Labor Code 2019, The employee is not present at work without acceptable excuses for at least 05 consecutive working days or more, the employer has the right to unilaterally terminate the labor contract. In this case, when unilaterally terminating the labor contract with the employee, the employer does not have to notify the employee in advance.

According to Section 4 Article 125 of the Labor Code 2019, the form of disciplinary dismissal is applied by the employer in case the employee The employee fails to go to work for a total period of 05 days in 30 days, or for a total period of 20 days in 365 days from the first day he/she fails to go to work without acceptable excuses.

Unlike the case of unilateral termination of the labor contract, as long as  the employee voluntarily quits without a plausible reason enough days as prescribed by law (does not require   the “continuous” factor of the act) then the employer  may apply the form of dismissal disciplinary action against the employee.

Also, in Clause 4 Article 125 of the 2019 Labor Code, “plausible reasons” are prescribed as natural disasters, fires; the employee or his/her family member suffers from illness with a certification by a competent health facility; and other reasons as stipulated in the internal labor regulations.  The Labor law also lists incomplete and detailed cases that are considered a good  reason, employers can   specify in detail in the labor  regulations  dynamic on  cases where plausible reasons are considered, e.g.  who the employee’s relatives include, which are the competent medical examination and treatment establishments; …

The above are the last two circumstances that employers can base on to handle labor discipline in the form of dismissal for employees. I hope TNTP’s article helps readers, see you in the legal analysis articles on the next topics .

Sincerely,

  1. For more information and to receive the latest articles of TNTP International Law Firm and Associates, please join our Facebook Fanpages at:
  1. To update the legal knowledge, please find out the following link:

https://dsdc.com.vn/category/chia-se-kien-thuc-phap-ly-ban-tin-phap-ly/

  1. To know more about the legal services of TNTP International Law Firm and Associates, please find out the following links:
  1. For more information, please contact us at the following information:

TNTP International Law Firm and Associates Ltd.

Lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha

Phone: 0931 798 818

Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com

Disciplinary measure for dismissal for the employee who commits sexual harassment in the workplace against the internal labor regulations

Continuing the topic of “Disciplinary measures for dismissal for employees”, in this article, we refer to the case of employees who were disciplined for dismissing when there was sexual harassment in the workplace – one of the sensitive issues receiving a lot of attention from society

and is a new point specified in the Labor Code 2019.

2. Cases in which employers are allowed to apply the form of dismissal labor discipline

2.4 Employees engage in sexual harassment in the workplace

According to Clause 9, Article 3 of the Labor Code 2019, sexual harassment in the workplace is an act of a sexual nature by any person towards another person at the workplace that is not desired or accepted by that person. A workplace is any place where an employee works as agreed or assigned by the employer (including a place or space related to the work).

a) Types of sexual harassment

  • Actions, gestures, physical contact with the body of a sexual or suggestive nature;
  • Verbal sexual harassment: sexual or suggestive comments or conversations in person, by phone, or through electronic media;
  • Non-verbal sexual harassment: body language; display, description of sex or sexual activities whether directly or through electronic media.

 b) Manifestations of sexual harassment

  • Offer work conditions, promise promotion, provide benefits, employment benefits in exchange for the sexual submission of the other;
  • Taking advantage of the other person’s weaknesses, shortcomings, bad work results, etc. to threaten and force this person to obey and meet his/her sexual behaviors and needs;
  • Oral sex, offensive comments, sexual slander about someone’s appearance, clothes, body;
  • Intentionally touching the body or taking advantage of the circumstances to be able to touch the body, or sensitive parts of others (for example, taking advantage of a crowded elevator to touch sensitive parts,…);
  • Assault, sexual abuse;
  • Pornography provocative sex, filming secretly taking pictures of other people’s sensitive parts (for example, installing a camera in the toilet to monitor,…).

c) Legal consequences of sexual harassment in the workplace

 When the employer has sufficient grounds to prove the existence of sexual harassment at the workplace and the Labor Regulations contain provisions on disciplinary handling of employees, dismissal when the employee commits such behavior, the employer can be disciplined for dismissal based on Clause 2, Article 125 of the Labor Code 2019. Besides, sexual harassment at the workplace can be administratively sanctioned from 15,000,000 VND to 30,000,000 VND according to the provisions of Clause 3, Article 11 of Decree No. 12/2022/ND-CP penalties for administrative violations against regulations on labor, social insurance, and Vietnamese guest workers. In addition, employees who commit this act may be examined for penal liability for related crimes as prescribed in the 2015 Criminal Code.

The above is the fourth case that the employer can base to handle labor discipline in the form of dismissal for the employee. Hope this article is helpful to you. We will continue to analyze cases in which employers are allowed to apply the form of dismissal to employees in the next article.

Best regards,

  1. For additional information and the newest articles from TNTP and Associates International Law Firm, please join our Facebook Fanpages at:
  1. Please click on the following link to learn more about legal knowledge:

https://dsdc.com.vn/en/category/legal-newsletter/

  1. Please click on the following links to learn more about the legal services of TNTP and Associates International Law Firm:
  1. For additional information, please contact us at:

TNTP and Associates International Law Firm

Lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha

Phone: 0931 798 818

Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com

Disciplinary measure for dismissal for the employee who commits acts that are seriously detrimental or posing seriously detrimental threat to the assets or interests of the employer

In the previous two sections, TNTP analyzed 02 cases in which employers can apply the form of dismissal discipline to employees, specifically: employees who commit acts of theft, embezzlement, gambling, intentionally causing injury, drug use in the workplace, and employees who disclose business secrets, technology secrets, infringing on the intellectual property rights of employers. In this article, we will continue to discuss the case of employees who are disciplined for dismissal when committing acts that cause serious damage or threaten to cause particularly serious damage to the assets and interests of employers.

2. Cases where employers are subject to the form of disciplining labor dismissal

2.3  Employees who commit acts of causing serious damage or threatening to cause particularly serious damage to assets and interests of employers

 Article 125 of the Labor Code 2019 provides for two acts that may cause employees to be disciplined in the form of dismissal, namely (i) acts causing serious damage to assets and interests of employers and (ii) acts has not caused actual damage but is likely to cause particularly serious damage to assets and interests of employers.

Currently, the Labor Code 2019 does not specify the acts considered to cause serious damage and threaten to cause particularly serious damage to the assets and interests of employers. Therefore, employers should prescribe these acts in the internal labor regulation to have grounds for handling violations of employees. The act of “threatening to cause particularly serious damage to the assets and interests of employers” is understood as an act that has not yet caused actual damage but has the potential to cause particularly serious damage to the assets and interests of employers. For example, employees have smoking behavior in warehouses containing garments, discharging water leading to flooding in the warehouse of electronic components products,…

To handle the dismissal discipline for the employee, the employer needs to base on the extent of the damage of the employee’s violation. The Labor Code 2019 does not specify the extent of damage when it is considered serious and especially serious, so the determination of the extent of damage should be based on the labor regulation. Depending on the characteristics of the enterprise, business model, and business lines, each enterprise determines the level of “serious damage”, and “especially serious damage” differently.

However, enterprises need to specify the level of serious damage, especially serious damage in accordance with reality because, for the labor regulation to take effect, the labor regulation should be approved by the Department of Labor, Invalids, and Social Affairs in the locality. Moreover, if there is a dispute between employees and businesses about this dismissal and the dispute is settled in court, each party must

prove its claim. At this time, the employer cannot only rely on the provisions of the labor regulation, which should be based on the conformity between labor regulation, legal regulations, and real-life practices.

According to the guidance of local labor authorities and the view of adjudicating labor dispute cases in court, the determination of the extent of serious damage is usually understood as from 10 months’ region-based minimum wage or more applied at the place where the employee works. This is an indirect inference from the provisions on material responsibility in Article 129 of the Labor Code 2019. Accordingly, if the employee causes “non-serious damage” due to negligence with a value of no more than 10 months’ region-based minimum wage announced by the Government applied at the place where the employee works, the employee must pay as much as 03 months of salary.

Thus, enterprises may stipulate serious harms valued at more than 10 months’ region-based minimum wage announced by the Government applied at the place where employees work; ii) particularly serious damages valued at more than 15 months of 10 months’ region-based minimum wage announced by the Government applied at the place where employees work.

Regarding the monthly region-based minimum wage, Decree No. 38/2022/ND-CP stipulates that from July 1, 2022, the monthly region-based minimum wage shall be implemented as follows: Zone I is VND 4,680,000/month; Zone II is VND 4,160,000/month; Zone III is VND 3,640,000 per month; Zone IV 3,250,000 VND/month. For example, for enterprises operating in the area of Zone I, the damage is considered serious when more than VND 46,800,000, and the damage is considered especially serious when more than VND 70,200,000.

Thus, when handling disciplinary dismissal of employees in case the employee commits acts of causing serious damage or threatening to cause serious damage to the assets, the interests of the employer should ensure: (i) The employee commits acts causing serious damage or threatening to cause particularly serious damage to assets and interests of employers; (ii) The labor regulation specifies the extent to which serious damages and particularly serious damages are determined; (iii) The labor regulation stipulates acts deemed to cause serious damage or threaten to cause particularly serious damage to assets and interests of employers; (iv) The employer can prove the employee’s violation.

The above is the third case in which employers can base to handle labor discipline in the form of layoffs for employees. I hope the article helps readers. We will continue to analyze the cases of employers applying the dismissal to employees in the next articles.

Best regards,

  1. For additional information and the newest articles from TNTP and Associates International Law Firm, please join our Facebook Fanpages at:
  1. Please click on the following link to learn more about legal knowledge:

https://dsdc.com.vn/en/category/legal-newsletter/

  1. Please click on the following links to learn more about the legal services of TNTP and Associates International Law Firm:
  1. For additional information, please contact us at:

TNTP and Associates International Law Firm

Lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha

Phone: 0931 798 818

Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com

Disciplinary measure for dismissal for the employee who discloses technological or business secrets or infringes the intellectual property rights of the employer

Successively Part 1 on the case of employees being disciplined for Employees committing acts of theft, embezzlement, gambling, deliberate infliction of injuries, and using drugs at work, in this week’s article, we will continue to share in cases Employees are disciplined for dismissal when disclosing business secrets, technology secrets, infringing on the intellectual property rights of employers.

2. Cases in which an employer is allowed to apply the dismissal labor disciplinary measure

  • The Employee discloses technological or business secrets, infringing on the intellectual property rights of employers

As well as the violations in section 2.1, when there is evidence that the employee performs one of the above acts at the workplace (workplace is any place where the employee works as agreed or assigned by the employer), the employer only needs to base on the employee’s behavior to dismiss the employee,  there is no need to base on the consequences of the damage caused by such behavior because these are acts that seriously affect the order in the enterprise.

Considering disclosing business secrets:

According to Clause 23 Article 4 of the Intellectual Property Law 2005, ” Business e secret means information obtained from activities of financial or intellectual investment, which has not yet been disclosed and which is able to be used in business.” Business secrets are not registered but in order to be protected, business secrets must satisfy the following conditions:

  • It is neither common knowledge nor easily obtainable;
  • When used in business activities, the business secret will create for its holder advantages over those who do not hold or use it;
  • The owner of the trade secret maintains its secrecy by necessary means so that the secret will not be disclosed nor be easily accessible.

In order to dismiss an employee for disciplinary reasons, employers need to stipulate what is the business secret in the labor regulations, from which the employer has grounds to determine whether the employee has disclosed this information or not.

Considering disclosing technological secrets:

 Firstly, we need to understand what do “technological secrets” mean? Currently, according to the Labor Code 2019 and related laws do not stipulate what “Technology Secrets” means. However, we can refer to the concept of “Technology” as stipulated in the Law on Technology Transfer 2017, according to which we can understand that technological secrets are information about solutions, processes, know-how with or without accompanying tools instruments, and facilities to convert resources into products.

Each enterprise will have different technological secrets, and not all solutions, processes, and know-how are considered technological secrets. Therefore, employers also need to clearly specify which solutions, processes, and know-how are technological secrets in order to have grounds to determine whether the employee has violated or not.

Considering infringing on the intellectual property rights :

 According to Article 4 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005, “Intellectual property rights means the rights of organizations and individuals to intellectual assets comprising copyright and copyright-related rights, industrial property rights and rights to plant varieties “.

 Intellectual property rights are protected when employers have one of the papers and documents:

  • A patent, Certificate, or Protection title Includes an invention patent, utility solution patent, industrial design patent, certificate of registered design of semi-conducting closed circuits, certificate of the registered mark, and certificate of the registered geographical indication, Protection title of Protected Plant Varieties; Protection title Copyright and Related Rights
  • An Extract of the National Register of Industrial Property; on Copyright and Related Rights; of Protected Plant Varieties
  • For has an internationally registered mark, evidence proving that the rights holder is the Certificate of International Registration Trademark protected in Vietnam issued by the State administrative body for the industrial property;
  • For other intellectual property objects, evidence proving that the rights holder is documents, samples, and information on the basis of arising rights, establishing corresponding rights as prescribed in Clause 1, Clause 2, Point b, Point c Clause 3 Article 6 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005.

Acts of infringement of intellectual property rights are specified and detailed for each type of intellectual property rights in Articles 28, 35, 126, 126, 127, 129, and 188 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005.

For infringing on the intellectual property rights, the employer has the right to dismiss an employee for disciplinary reasons, and besides, depending on the nature and seriousness of the violation, the employee who commits the violation may also be held administrative penalties or criminal prosecution and shall pay compensation for any damage caused as prescribed by law

Above is the second case that employers can base on to apply dismissal labor disciplinary. In addition to legal consulting activities, we will continue to analyze the next dismissal cases in the next week’s articles. We kindly invite your attention to the following articles

Best regards,

  1. For additional information and the newest articles from TNTP and Associates International Law Firm, please join our Facebook Fanpages at:
  1. Please click on the following link to learn more about legal knowledge:

https://dsdc.com.vn/en/category/legal-newsletter/

  1. Please click on the following links to learn more about the legal services of TNTP and Associates International Law Firm:
  1. For additional information, please contact us at:

TNTP and Associates International Law Firm

Lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha

Phone: 0931 798 818

Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com

TNTP International Law Firm and Associates

Lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha

Phone number: 0931 798 818

Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com

TNTP & ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM

  • Office in Ho Chi Minh City:
    Room no. 1901, 19 th Floor Saigon Trade Center Tower, No. 37 Ton Duc Thang Street, Ben Nghe Ward, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City
  • Office in Hanoi City:
    No. 2, Alley 308 Tay Son str, Thinh Quang Ward, Dong Da Dist, Hanoi City
  • Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com


    The copyright belongs to: TNTP & Associates International Law Firm