Skip to main content

Author: TNTP LAW

Land use rights contracts – Basic content You need to know

Contract of land use rights is a common type of contract in today’s society. Nevertheless, compared to other types of contracts, the contract of land use rights needs to meet several conditions prescribed by law in order to be valid for the parties. In this article, TNTP will analyze the fundamental content you need to know about this contract.

I. Definition

According to Article 500 of the Civil Code 2015, the contract of land use rights means the agreement between the parties that the land user convert, transfer, lease, sublease, donate, mortgage and contribute land use rights as capital or exercise other rights to the other party as prescribed in the Law on land; and the other party shall exercise rights and perform obligations according to the contract to the land user.

It can be seen that the contract of land use rights includes various types of contracts such as contracts for conversion, transfer, lease, donation, mortgage, capital contribution with land use rights, etc. The object of all these contracts is land use rights, but the content of each type of contract will be different.

II. Content of the contract

The contract of land use right is governed by the Civil Code 2015 and the Land Law 2013, etc. Accordingly, such contract includes provisions upon agreement by the parties that do not violate prohibited provisions of the law and do not contrary to social morality. On the other hand, the contents of the contract must not contravene the regulations on land use purposes, duration of land use, master plans and plans on land use, and other rights and obligations as prescribed by the law on land and other provisions of relevant laws.

III. Form of the contract

According to Article 502 of the Civil Code 2015, contracts relating to land use rights must be made in writing in the form consistent with the provisions of this Code, the law on land and other provisions of relevant laws.

According to Clause 3 Article 167 of Land Law 2013, contracts on transfer, donation, contribution of land use rights as capital or the rights to use land and land-attached assets must be notarized or certified, except the case of real estate business (one party or all parties involved in the transaction is/are a real estate business organization) is notarized or certified at the request of the parties.

IV. When does the contract take effect for the parties?

Generally, civil transactions take effect from the date of signing. However, according to the provisions of Article 503 of the Civil Code 2015, the transfer of land use rights shall be effect from the date of registration in accordance with the provisions of the law on land.

V. Other Notes

Pursuant to Article 64 of Decree 43/2014/ND-CP and Clause 5, Article 14 of Circular 02/2015/TT-BTNMT:

+ Contracts and transaction documents on land use rights and ownership of land-attached assets of households shall be signed by the persons named in the certificates or authorized in accordance with the civil law. Any person who has his/her name on the certificates or is authorized as prescribed by the civil law shall be permitted to perform signing the contract, written transaction for land use rights and ownership of land-linked properties only if all members of the household using the land agree in writing and such agreement must be authenticated or certified as true copy according to the law provisions.

+ Contracts and transaction documents on land use rights and ownership of land-attached assets of groups of land users or groups of owners of land-attached assets shall be signed by all group members or enclosed with authorization documents in accordance with the civil law, except the case of apartment owners sharing the use of a land parcel in an apartment building.

Above is the content of the article “Land use rights contracts – Basic content You need to know” that TNTP sent to readers. If you have any futher questions, please contact TNTP for the best support.

Best regards,

The contract for bailment of property: Basic content You need to know

Contracts for bailment of property is a common type of civil contract whereby a bailee accepts the property of a bailor for safekeeping and must return to the bailor upon expiry of the duration of the contract, and the bailor must pay a fee to the bailee unless otherwise agreed by the parties. In the current economic context, this contract plays a crucial role in safekeeping and managing property, meanwhile generating economic benefits for the parties involved. In the following article, TNTP will provide readers with the basic terms and provisions of the contract for bailment of property.

I. Definition

Pursuant to Article 554 of the Civil Code 2015, the contract for bailment of property means an agreement between parties whereby a bailee accepts the property of a bailor for safekeeping and must return to the bailor upon expiry of the duration of the contract, and the bailor must pay a fee to the bailee, except where the bailment is free of charge.

Therefore, in the contract, the bailor transfers the property as well as the possession to the bailee for a specified period. The bailee receives and safeguards the property within the agreed-upon timeframe.

Upon the expiration of the bailment of property, the bailee returns the property in the same condition in which the bailee received it, and the bailor must pay a fee to the bailee for the bailment service. However, the parties may agree the bailment is free of charge. In this case, the bailee still should fulfil obligations similar to the case the fee is received.

II. Legal features of the contract for bailment of property

Firstly, the subject matter of the contract can be movable or immovable property, as long as the property is capable of being freely traded. For difficult-to-preserve or hazardous property, the bailor must package them carefully and in accordance with legal regulations, if any. The bailee must have the necessary facilities such as warehouses, yards, and fire-fighting equipment to ensure the safety of the property and to prevent potential risks.

Secondly, this contract is a type of bilateral contract. The bailor has the right to demand that the bailee safe keep the property and returns them upon the expiration of the contract or at the bailor’s request. The bailee is entitled to demand that the bailor retrieves the property when the contract expires and pays the agreed-upon fee.

Thirdly, this contract can be either compensatory or non-compensatory. If the bailor is required to pay a fee to the bailee, it is a compensatory contract. Conversely, if the bailee does not receive any remuneration from the bailor, it is a non-compensatory contract.

Fourthly, this contract can be expressed verbally, in writing, or through specific acts. In reality, for contracts of small value, the parties often select the form of verbal agreements. Typically, the bailee can hand over a ticket as evidence of the contract’s formation. It is important to note that the ticket serves as proof of the existence of the contract but is not a contract itself.

Above is the content of the article “The contract for bailment of property: Basic content You need to know”. Hope the above sharing is useful for those who are interested in this issue.

Best regards,

Evidence is required to prove that the employer has unlawfully terminated the labour contract

Since the employee is unilaterally terminated from the labour contract, if the employee believes that such termination is unlawful, the employee needs to promptly gather relevant evidence regarding the incident. In the following article, TNTP will provide employees with essential evidence that needs to be collected to prove the employer’s unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract.

1. Evidence showing the employment relationship

The first evidence that the employee needs to gather is the labour contract, as the labour contract demonstrates the employment relationship between the employee and the employer. However, in some cases, the employee and the employer may not sign a labour contract, or the contract might not be in written form. In such cases, the employee can collect other valid evidence, such as probationary contracts, job offer letters, job acceptance emails, work-related email exchanges within the enterprise, attendance records, documents indicating the enterprise’s salary payments to the employee, such as individual payroll records, salary transfer documents to the employee’s account, etc.

2. Evidence demonstrating the grounds for unilateral termination of the labour contract

When unilaterally terminating the labour contract with the employee, the employer will present the grounds or reasons for such termination, such as the employee’s consistent failure to complete assigned tasks, the employee’s voluntary resignation without valid reasons, etc. In this case, the employer may create documents that demonstrate the employee’s violations, such as meeting minutes, work records, incident reports, etc.

3. Evidence demonstrating the termination of the labour contract

When unilaterally terminating the labour contract, the employer may issue termination notices, termination decisions, etc. If the employer does not issue a termination decision, or the employer issues a decision but doesn’t provide it to the employee, or the employer issues a notice but unilaterally terminates the contract in practice, the employee needs to gather evidence showing the enterprise’s prevention of employee’s work rights, evidence demonstrating the enterprise’s obstruction of the employee’s work rights, etc.

4. Evidence demonstrating the labour-related benefits fulfilled and unfulfilled by the employer

When unilaterally terminating the labour contract with the employee, whether legally or unlawfully, the employer still has obligations towards the employee, such as paying all relevant sums related to the employee’s entitlements including salary, termination allowance, salary for unused annual leave days, etc. Evidence for these benefits includes payment documents, accounts receivable reconciliation records, social insurance records, etc.

5. Internal enterprise documents

As explained earlier, when unilaterally terminating the labour contract with the employee, the employer needs to justify the termination based on legally appropriate grounds. One of the bases that the employer often uses is the employee’s consistent failure to complete assigned tasks. The employer must establish the criteria for assessment of employees’ fulfilment of duties to terminate based on this ground. The employee should review the content of the criteria, and assess whether the procedure for implementing it complies with legal requirements.

The law does not specify the exact procedure that the employer must follow for unilaterally terminating labour contracts. Therefore, employees should research whether the procedure is outlined in the enterprise’s internal documents, to verify whether the enterprise has adhered to the provisions of these internal documents. Additionally, employees should gather information on the salary and bonus policies, as these documents will be applied to address the employee’s rights in cases where disputes arise over salary amounts, serving as a basis for resolving the consequences of the unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract.

In cases where the enterprise has established labour agreements or internal regulations, employees should collect this information to seek relevant content related to the unilateral termination of labour contracts and the rights of employees when facing such unilateral termination.

6. Other relevant documents

Apart from the documents mentioned above, based on the actual situation, the employee should gather other documents relevant to the incident. For instance, if the received salary by the employee differs from the salary specified in the labour contract, the employee can collect evidence showing the actual salary paid to the employee, such as individual payroll records, salary transfer documents to the employee’s account, etc.

Collecting and compiling evidence will support the employee in proving the employer’s unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract and establish the basis to protect the employee’s rights. In other words, thorough evidence collection will provide the employee with the necessary grounds to demonstrate that the employer’s unilateral termination was unlawful, and allow the employee to demand that the employer fulfil responsibilities.

The above is the article “Evidence is required to prove that the employer has unlawfully terminated the labour contract” that TNTP provides to the readers. For any issues requiring discussion, please contact TNTP for assistance.

Best regards,

Unilaterally terminating a labour contract against the law – Who is responsible for resolving it?

If the employee faces unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract, the employee has the right to request relevant individuals, organizations, and authorities to resolve the dispute on their behalf. In the following article, TNTP will present some individuals, organizations, and authorities that assist in resolving disputes for terminating a labour contract

1. Representative Organization of Employees

The representative organization of employees means an internal organization voluntarily established by employees of an employer which protects the employees’ legitimate rights and interests in labour relations through collective bargaining or other methods prescribed by labour laws. Representative organizations of employees include internal trade unions and internal employee organizations.

Therefore, it can be seen that the representative organization of employees is established to protect the legitimate rights of employees. When the employee’s rights are violated, the employee can request this organization to resolve disputes related to the employer’s unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract.

2. Employer

When the employee believes that the employer has unlawfully terminated the labour contract and has evidence to support this claim, the employee should first engage in negotiations with the employer. Negotiations can be conducted through written communication, emails, online meetings, or in-person discussions. If the employer is cooperative, both parties can agree on a suitable resolution based on their mutual interests. If the employer maintains her/his opinion or refuses to engage, the employee can draft a formal complaint to submit to the employer. This serves as evidence that the employee has initiated the first complaint to the employer, after which the employee can proceed to file a second complaint with the Chief Inspector of the Department of Labour – Invalids and Social Affairs.

3. Chief Inspector of the Department of Labour – Invalids and Social Affairs

The Employee can request the Chief Inspector of the Department of Labour – Invalids and Social Affairs at the location where the enterprise is headquartered to handle the second complaint when the employee disagrees with the initial resolution by the employer or when the prescribed time limit for resolution has passed.

The time limit for resolving the initial complaint is no more than 30 days from the date of acceptance; for complex cases, the time limit is no more than 45 days from the date of acceptance. In remote or difficult-to-reach areas, the time limit is no more than 45 days from the date of acceptance; for complex cases in these areas, the time limit is no more than 60 days from the date of acceptance.

4. Labour Mediator

The employee can request a labour mediator to resolve the dispute with the employer. Labour mediators have the responsibility to guide and support the parties in negotiations to resolve.

5. Labour Arbitration Council

In cases where the employee and the employer agree to resolve the dispute through the Labour Arbitration Council, both parties have the right to request the Labour Arbitration Council to handle the dispute according to legal regulations.

6. Competent Court

After unsuccessful negotiations with the employer, most employees resort to litigation in the competent Court due to the effectiveness of this method.

Firstly, disputes regarding unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract do not require mandatory mediation by a labour mediator. Therefore, employees can directly initiate legal proceedings in the competent Court.

Secondly, employees are exempt from paying advance court fees and court fees when initiating proceedings to resolve disputes related to unlawful termination of the labour contract. To be exempt from these fees, employees need to submit a request for exemption or reduction of court fees along with relevant documents and evidence of eligibility.

Thirdly, in cases where the Court issues a favourable judgment/decision for the employee, the employee has the right to request enforcement authorities to compel the employer to execute the Court’s judgment/decision. This is arguably the most effective approach to litigation, as in other resolution methods, even if both parties agree on terms favourable to the employee, the employer’s non-compliance would not allow the employee to enforce the terms. Therefore, the employee can continue to pursue litigation in the competent Court.

7. Other Individuals, Organizations, and Authorities

Employees can request other relevant organizations and authorities to safeguard their rights and interests. These include social insurance agencies (in cases involving disputes related to insurance contributions, failure to record social insurance, etc.), the Vietnam General Confederation of Labour, the Labor Union of the city where the employer is headquartered, etc.
Additionally, employees can consider engaging legal services from lawyers specializing in labour law. Lawyers can propose resolution strategies, draft necessary documents, provide advice, and represent employees in protecting their rights and interests.

The above is the article “Unilaterally terminating a labour contract against the law – Who is responsible for resolving it?” that TNTP presents to readers. Should there be any issues requiring discussion, please contact TNTP for assistance.

Sincerely,

Assessing the legality of the employer’s unilateral termination of a labour contract

The unlawful unilateral termination of a labour contract has a significant impact on the rights and livelihood of the employee. Therefore, when facing such termination, the employee needs to ascertain its legality to request relevant individuals, authorities, and organizations to safeguard their rights. To determine the legality of the employer’s unilateral termination of the labour contract, the employee should rely on legal provisions and legitimate internal documents of the enterprise.

1. Assessing the legality of the basis for unilateral termination used by the employer

The employee should evaluate whether the basis used by the employer for the unilateral termination complies with legal regulations. The employer is only entitled to unilaterally terminate a labour contract under the cases stipulated in Article 36(1) of the Labor Code 2019 (“LC”). If the employer’s unilateral termination does not meet the requirements of Article 36(1) LC, it can be considered an unlawful unilateral termination.

The situations in which the employer is entitled to unilaterally terminate the contract are as follows:

(a) The employee repeatedly fails to perform his/her work according to the criteria for assessment of employees’ fulfilment of duties established by the employer.

(b) The employee is sick or has an accident and remains unable to work after having received treatment for a period of 12 consecutive months in the case of an indefinite-term labour contract, for 06 consecutive months in the case of a labour contract with a fixed term of 12 – 36 months, or more than half the duration of the contract in case of a labour contract with a fixed term of fewer than 12 months.

(c) Due to natural disasters, fires, dangerous epidemics, hostility, relocation or downsizing requested by a competent authority, the employer has to lay off employees after all possibilities have been exhausted.

(d) The employee is not present at the workplace after the time limit specified in Article 31 LC (Within 15 days from the expiry of the suspension period of the labour contract, the employee shall be present at the workplace and the employer shall reinstate the employee under the labour contract if it is still unexpired unless otherwise agreed by both parties or prescribed by law).

(e) The employee reaches the retirement age specified in Article 169 LC unless otherwise agreed by the parties (Refer to Decree No. 135/2020/ND-CP on retirement age regulations).

(f) The employee is not present at work without acceptable excuses for at least 05 consecutive working days.

(g) The employee fails to provide truthful information during the conclusion of the labour contract in accordance with Article 16(2) LC in a manner that affects recruitment (The employee shall provide the employer with truthful information about his/her full name, date of birth, gender, residence, educational level, occupational skills and qualifications, health conditions and other issues directly related to the conclusion of the labour contract which are requested by the employer).

2. Assessing the legality of unilateral termination based on the enterprise’s internal documents

As the law does not specify the particular procedure that the employer needs to follow when unilaterally terminating a labour contract, the procedure can be stipulated within the enterprise’s internal documents.

The employee should delve into internal documents related to the employer’s unilateral termination of labour contracts, such as labour regulations, collective labour agreements, the criteria for assessment of employees’ fulfilment of duties, etc. This is to ascertain whether the enterprise has adhered to the correct procedure, whether any actions contrary to the provisions of these internal documents have been taken, and whether any employee rights have been omitted when unilaterally terminating labour contracts.

Currently, enterprises often unilaterally terminate labour contracts with the reason that the employee frequently fails to fulfil job duties as per the contract. However, for such cases, the employer needs to establish the criteria for assessment of employees’ fulfilment of duties in compliance with legal regulations. If the employer does not issue the criteria or issues it not in accordance with legal provisions, the employer cannot unilaterally terminate the labour contract based on the reason that the employee frequently fails to fulfil job duties. The law stipulates that these criteria issued by the employer must involve seeking the opinion of the employee representative organization at the workplace if such representation exists in the enterprise.

3. Assessing the legality of the employer’s prior notification of unilateral termination of the labour contract to the employee

The employee needs to determine whether the employer has provided prior notice of the unilateral termination of the labour contract to the employee in compliance with legal provisions. Notification requirements are stated in Clause 2 and Clause 3 Article 36 LC.

For unilateral termination under situations (a), (b), (c), (e), and (g) mentioned in Part 1 of this article, the employer must notify the employee as follows:

(i) At least 45 days for indefinite-term contracts.

(ii) At least 30 days for fixed-term contracts with a term of 12 to 36 months.

(iii) At least 03 working days for fixed-term contracts with a term of fewer than 12 months and the situation described in (b) in Part 1 of this article.

(iv) In some specific industries, trades, or jobs, the notification period complies with Government regulations (Refer to Article 7 of Decree No. 145/2020/ND-CP detailing and guiding the implementation of certain provisions of the Labor Code regarding labour conditions and labour relations).

For unilateral termination under situations (d) and (f) mentioned in Part 1, the employer is not required to provide prior notice to the employee.

Above is the article “Assessing the legality of the employer’s unilateral termination of a labour contract” sent by TNTP to the readers. In case of any inquiries, please contact TNTP for assistance.

Best regards,

Responsibilities of the employer when unilaterally terminating a labour contract against the law

The employer is responsible for providing work and paying salary to the employee, ensuring a safe working environment, complying with legal regulations, and respecting the rights of the employee. However, many employers have failed to fulfil their responsibilities, unilaterally terminating labour contracts unlawfully, significantly affecting the employee’s rights. Thus, in cases of unlawful unilateral termination of labour contracts by the employer, what responsibilities can the employee demand from the employer? In the following article, TNTP will detail the responsibilities the employer must bear when unilaterally terminating labour contracts against the law.

1. Responsibilities of the employer when unilaterally terminating labour contracts

According to Article 46, Article 48, Clause 3 of Article 113 of the 2019 Labor Code (“LC”), when unilaterally terminating the labour contract with the employee by or against the law, the employer still has the following responsibilities towards the employee:

(i) Fully settle all relevant amounts related to the employee’s entitlements (salary, termination allowance, salary for unused annual leave days, etc.) within 14 working days from the date of labour contract termination. However, this period may extend, but not exceed 30 days, in the following cases:

a) The employer is not an individual terminating activities;

b) The employer changes the structure, technology, or for economic reasons of the enterprise;

c) Division, separation, merger, amalgamation; sale, lease, conversion of the enterprise type; transfer of ownership rights, use rights to the assets of the enterprise or cooperative;

d) Due to natural disasters, fires, enemy actions, or dangerous epidemics.

(ii) Complete the procedures for confirming the period of social insurance, and unemployment insurance, and return the original copies of other documents held by the employer;

(iii) Provide copies of relevant documents regarding the employee’s work process if requested. Costs of copying and sending documents are borne by the employer.

The employee should note the following: In cases where annual leave has not been taken or not all annual leave days have been used, the employer must pay salary for the remaining unused leave days; the employer must provide termination allowance for the employee who has worked regularly for the employer for at least 12 months, receiving half a month’s salary for each year worked, except in cases where the conditions for receiving retirement benefits are met according to the regulations of social insurance, or the employee voluntarily resigns without valid reasons for five consecutive working days or more.

Depending on the enterprise’s internal documents and agreements between the employee and the employer, the employer may also have additional responsibilities when terminating labour contracts, such as paying support amounts. Therefore, when faced with unilateral labour contract termination by the employer, the employee should rely on legal provisions, internal regulations of the enterprise, and agreements between the parties to determine the responsibilities that the employer must fulfil. If the employer fails to comply or incompletely complies, the employee has the right to demand that the employer fulfil all the responsibilities.

2. Responsibilities of the employer when unilaterally terminating labour contracts unlawfully

When unilaterally terminating the labour contract unlawfully, in addition to fulfilling the responsibilities defined in the first part of the article, the employer must also bear the responsibilities stipulated in Article 41 of the LC, which include:

(i) The employer must reinstate the employee to work according to the labour contract that was concluded, pay salary, contribute social insurance, health insurance, and unemployment insurance for the days the employee was not able to work and pay an additional amount to the employee of at least two months’ salary according to the labour contract.

(ii) In case of violating the notice period requirement, the employer must pay an amount corresponding to the salary according to the labour contract for the days without prior notice.

(iii) If the originally assigned position or work in the labour contract is no longer available, and the employee still wants to work, both parties must agree to amend or supplement the labour contract.

(iv) In cases where the employee does not wish to continue working, in addition to the mentioned payment, the employer must provide a termination allowance to end the labour contract.

(v) If the employer does not want to re-employ the employee and the employee agrees, in addition to the mentioned payment and termination allowance, the parties must agree on additional compensation for the employee, but at least equivalent to two months’ salary according to the labour contract to terminate the labour contract.

The employee should note the following: After being re-employed, the employee must reimburse the termination allowance, and unemployment allowance if received from the employer.

Thus, when unlawfully unilaterally terminating the labour contract, the employee can request the employer to undertake the responsibilities according to legal regulations.

The above is the article “Responsibilities of the employer when unilaterally terminating a labour contract against the law” that TNTP sends to the readers. In case of issues requiring discussion, please contact TNTP for assistance.

Best regards,

Evidence is required to prove that the employer has unlawfully terminated the labour contract

Since the employee is unilaterally terminated from the labour contract, if the employee believes that such termination is unlawful, the employee needs to promptly gather relevant evidence regarding the incident. In the following article, TNTP will provide employees with essential evidence that needs to be collected to prove the employer’s unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract.

1. Evidence showing the employment relationship

The first evidence that the employee needs to gather is the labour contract, as the labour contract demonstrates the employment relationship between the employee and the employer. However, in some cases, the employee and the employer may not sign a labour contract, or the contract might not be in written form. In such cases, the employee can collect other valid evidence, such as probationary contracts, job offer letters, job acceptance emails, work-related email exchanges within the enterprise, attendance records, documents indicating the enterprise’s salary payments to the employee, such as individual payroll records, salary transfer documents to the employee’s account, etc.

2. Evidence demonstrating the grounds for unilateral termination of the labour contract

When unilaterally terminating the labour contract with the employee, the employer will present the grounds or reasons for such termination, such as the employee’s consistent failure to complete assigned tasks, the employee’s voluntary resignation without valid reasons, etc. In this case, the employer may create documents that demonstrate the employee’s violations, such as meeting minutes, work records, incident reports, etc.

3. Evidence demonstrating the termination of the labour contract

When unilaterally terminating the labour contract, the employer may issue termination notices, termination decisions, etc. If the employer does not issue a termination decision, or the employer issues a decision but doesn’t provide it to the employee, or the employer issues a notice but unilaterally terminates the contract in practice, the employee needs to gather evidence showing the enterprise’s prevention of employee’s work rights, evidence demonstrating the enterprise’s obstruction of the employee’s work rights, etc.

4. Evidence demonstrating the labour-related benefits fulfilled and unfulfilled by the employer

When unilaterally terminating the labour contract with the employee, whether legally or unlawfully, the employer still has obligations towards the employee, such as paying all relevant sums related to the employee’s entitlements including salary, termination allowance, salary for unused annual leave days, etc. Evidence for these benefits includes payment documents, accounts receivable reconciliation records, social insurance records, etc.

5. Internal enterprise documents

As explained earlier, when unilaterally terminating the labour contract with the employee, the employer needs to justify the termination based on legally appropriate grounds. One of the bases that the employer often uses is the employee’s consistent failure to complete assigned tasks. The employer must establish the criteria for assessment of employees’ fulfilment of duties to terminate based on this ground. The employee should review the content of the criteria, and assess whether the procedure for implementing it complies with legal requirements.

The law does not specify the exact procedure that the employer must follow for unilaterally terminating labour contracts. Therefore, employees should research whether the procedure is outlined in the enterprise’s internal documents, to verify whether the enterprise has adhered to the provisions of these internal documents. Additionally, employees should gather information on the salary and bonus policies, as these documents will be applied to address the employee’s rights in cases where disputes arise over salary amounts, serving as a basis for resolving the consequences of the unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract.

In cases where the enterprise has established labour agreements or internal regulations, employees should collect this information to seek relevant content related to the unilateral termination of labour contracts and the rights of employees when facing such unilateral termination.

6. Other relevant documents

Apart from the documents mentioned above, based on the actual situation, the employee should gather other documents relevant to the incident. For instance, if the received salary by the employee differs from the salary specified in the labour contract, the employee can collect evidence showing the actual salary paid to the employee, such as individual payroll records, salary transfer documents to the employee’s account, etc.

Collecting and compiling evidence will support the employee in proving the employer’s unlawful unilateral termination of the labour contract and establish the basis to protect the employee’s rights. In other words, thorough evidence collection will provide the employee with the necessary grounds to demonstrate that the employer’s unilateral termination was unlawful, and allow the employee to demand that the employer fulfil responsibilities.

The above is the article “Evidence is required to prove that the employer has unlawfully terminated the labour contract” that TNTP provides to the readers. For any issues requiring discussion, please contact TNTP for assistance.

Best regards,

 

TNTP & ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM

  • Office in Ho Chi Minh City:
    Room no. 1901, 19 th Floor Saigon Trade Center Tower, No. 37 Ton Duc Thang Street, Ben Nghe Ward, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City
  • Office in Hanoi City:
    No. 2, Alley 308 Tay Son str, Thinh Quang Ward, Dong Da Dist, Hanoi City
  • Email: ha.nguyen@tntplaw.com


    The copyright belongs to: TNTP & Associates International Law Firm