With the rapid development of the global economy and the trend of international integration, countries are continuously expanding markets, enhancing cooperation, and promoting international trade activities. Consequently, disputes in international sales contracts are on the rise and becoming increasingly complex, necessitating a swift resolution mechanism based on the perspectives and agreements of the involved parties.
In this context, arbitration as a dispute resolution method stands out with its superior advantages, aligning with the needs of businesses for effective dispute resolution. This article by TNTP will provide a detailed analysis of the fundamental aspects of resolving international sales contract disputes through arbitration, offering readers a comprehensive overview of the use of this method.
1. Definition
Disputes in international sales contracts are a type of international commercial dispute that typically arises between traders from different countries. These disputes often emerge during the execution of the contract, primarily in the following forms:
• Seller’s Breach of Contract: This includes scenarios such as failure to deliver goods, delayed delivery, or failure to provide the necessary documentation related to the goods as agreed upon.
• Buyer’s Breach of Contract: This involves situations such as delayed acceptance of goods, refusal to accept goods, or delayed payment or non-payment as committed.
• Disputes over Contract Formation: The use of communication methods such as email, fax, or other forms of electronic exchange can lead to disagreements between the parties, resulting in disputes over the validity or interpretation of the contract terms.
• Disputes over the Legal Status of the Contracting Parties: These disputes arise concerning the legal authority of the parties involved in the contract signing.
• Disputes over Contract Content: Due to differences in national laws or international regulations, conflicts may arise in the contract’s interpretation and application of one or more terms.
To prevent and minimize the risk of disputes, the parties should engage in thorough negotiations and have a firm understanding of the relevant legal regulations before signing the contract.
2. Advantages of Arbitration Compared to Other Methods
Resolving disputes in international sales contracts through arbitration offers several advantages, including:
• Ensures Maximum Freedom of Choice for the Parties: The disputing parties have the freedom to choose the arbitration venue, procedural rules, language, and arbitrators, without being restricted by the location of their headquarters. This ensures that the dispute resolution process aligns with the needs and preferences of the parties involved.
• Finality of Arbitration Awards: An arbitration award is final and cannot be appealed. This finality is particularly crucial in business, as it ensures that disputes are resolved promptly and conclusively, saving the parties time.
• High Confidentiality: The arbitration process and the arbitration award are kept confidential unless the parties agree otherwise. This confidentiality is beneficial for businesses that wish to protect sensitive information and maintain their reputations.
• Right to Choose Arbitrators: The disputing parties have the right to freely select arbitrators to handle their cases. This allows the parties to choose arbitrators with deep expertise and experience relevant to the nature of the dispute. The ability to select arbitrators not only enhances the objectivity of the process but also strengthens the parties’ confidence in the fairness and accuracy of the arbitration award. In international sales contracts, where disputes are often complex and require high expertise, the right to choose arbitrators plays a crucial role in ensuring that issues are reviewed by experts who genuinely understand the matter and can make sound decisions.
• Independence and Neutrality: Arbitrators are not government entities, and therefore, they are not subject to any interference from state agencies or any third party. This independence allows arbitrators to conduct proceedings neutrally. The neutrality ensures that arbitration is free from external pressures, leading to fair decisions based on facts and the law.
These advantages make arbitration a suitable choice for businesses needing to resolve disputes in international sales contracts, especially in the increasingly complex context of globalized business.
3. Forms of Commercial Arbitration
Currently, commercial arbitration can take two forms: ad hoc arbitration and institutional arbitration, as detailed below:
• Ad Hoc Arbitration: This form of dispute resolution is established based on the agreement between the disputing parties to resolve a specific case. Once the dispute is resolved, the ad hoc arbitration terminates. The key characteristic of ad hoc arbitration is its high flexibility and customization, as the parties are free to agree on procedural rules, arbitrators, venue, and language for the proceedings without being bound by any fixed rules. This flexibility makes ad hoc arbitration a preferred choice in many situations, particularly when the parties seek a swift, effective solution tailored to the specifics of each case.
• Institutional Arbitration: This form of dispute resolution is conducted through an organized arbitration institution with a defined structure, headquarters, a roster of arbitrators, and its own set of rules. In Vietnam, institutional arbitration operates in the form of arbitration centers, which have legal personality, seals, and separate bank accounts, ensuring independent operations and the ability to handle multiple disputes professionally and systematically. These arbitration centers have a dispute resolution mechanism with established rules and procedures, ensuring consistency and transparency in handling disputes. In the context of international trade, institutional arbitration is a popular choice for businesses due to its stability, reputation, and ability to provide high-quality arbitration services with the support of arbitrators who possess deep expertise and extensive practical experience.
These two forms of arbitration offer different dispute resolution options, catering to the diverse needs of disputing parties based on each case’s specific characteristics and circumstances. Therefore, the arbitration form choice depends on the disputing parties’ particular requirements.
4. Applicable Law
In dispute resolution, the applicable law is determined based on the parties’ freedom to agree. Accordingly, the parties have the right to choose national law or international legal provisions as the basis for resolving the dispute. In the absence of an agreement on the applicable law, the arbitration tribunal has the authority to determine the applicable law that it deems most appropriate given the nature and circumstances of the dispute.
The above article on “Resolution of International Sales Contract Disputes through Arbitration” is provided by TNTP for our readers. Should you have any issues that require further discussion, please do not hesitate to contact TNTP for timely assistance.
Sincerely,
